Why Storytelling Is Becoming a Go-To-Market Advantage with Angeley Mullins, Aetheris Ventures

August 14, 2026

Are product features enough to stand out anymore?

On this week’s episode of The FODcast, Tim is joined by Angeley Mullins, Founder & CEO of Aetheris Ventures, to explore how founder-led branding, storytelling and AI are reshaping go-to-market strategy.

From the rise of AI-generated content, through to changing buyer expectations and the growing demand for authenticity, this is a really interesting conversation about how businesses build trust in an increasingly noisy market.

We also discuss:

  • Why founder-led branding is becoming more important
  • How storytelling is shifting from “nice to have” to strategic advantage
  • Why audiences are tired of purely feature-led messaging
  • How AI is changing sales, marketing and customer success roles
  • Why creativity, critical thinking and prompting are becoming key skills

A really useful listen for founders, CEOs, marketers and growth leaders thinking about how to differentiate in a market where products and content can be replicated faster than ever.

Listen | Share | Comment

Written by:

Tim Roedel

CEO

Connect on LinkedIn

Retail Media, In-Store Screens and the Fight for Attention – with Dean Harris, Co-op and Anders Henricson, Grassfish

July 28, 2026

There’s a fine line between smart retail media and too much noise.

On this episode of The FODcast, Tim is joined by Dean Harris, from Co-op Media Network, and Anders Henricson, from Grassfish, to unpack what that balance looks like in practice.

The conversation gets into the commercial opportunity behind retail media, but also the customer experience risk if retailers allow short-term revenue to override shopper needs.

From in-store screens and attention metrics, through to data, customer journeys and commercial layout, this is a really interesting conversation about how retailers can unlock new media revenue without compromising the shopping experience.

We cover a whole host of topics including:

  • Why retail media has become such an important growth opportunity
  • The risk of communication overload in-store
  • How Co-op approaches campaign governance and customer experience
  • Why attention may matter more than impressions
  • How connected screens can support, rather than disrupt, the customer journey

A strong listen for retailers, brands and anyone thinking about the future of in-store media, customer attention and connected retail experiences.

Listen | Share | Comment

Written by:

Tim Roedel

CEO

Connect on LinkedIn

Why Slow Hiring Could Be Costing Digital Commerce Businesses the Best Talent

July 27, 2026

Hiring across digital commerce is rarely straightforward. The market moves quickly, skills are constantly evolving and the candidates businesses most want to hire are often speaking to more than one organisation at the same time.

That is particularly true across ecommerce, retail technology and digital transformation, where demand continues in areas such as frontend engineering, product data, PIM, subscriptions, customer-facing technology, project delivery and business development.

However, one issue continues to create unnecessary risk for employers: the hiring process itself.

Across the market, interview processes appear to be taking longer. Some of that may simply be seasonal. Summer diaries are difficult, decision-makers are away and calendars become harder to align. But there is also a wider challenge around urgency, structure and decision-making.

For retailers, agencies, consultancies and technology partners, that can quickly become a problem. A slow hiring process does not just delay a start date. It can mean losing the right person altogether.

Hiring demand is there, but process matters

While businesses are still being considered in how they hire, demand for specialist digital commerce talent has not gone away. Businesses are continuing to invest in platform upgrades, re-platforming projects, ecommerce optimisation, customer experience, AI adoption and data-led transformation.

The wider skills picture supports this. The Open University’s Business Barometer 2026 found that 57% of UK employers are facing skills shortages, while the Skills England Annual Skills Report 2026 highlights digital and technologies as one of the high-growth sectors where skills supply will need to keep growing.

For digital commerce businesses, that means momentum matters. When the right candidate is in front of you, the process needs to be ready to move.

From frontend engineers and ecommerce project managers to solutions consultants, product data specialists and commercial hires, strong candidates are still being approached about multiple opportunities. Speed is not the only factor in securing talent, but it is increasingly becoming a competitive advantage.

Moving quickly does not mean cutting corners. It means having a clear, well-managed process that allows good decisions to be made without unnecessary delay.

Slow hiring can slow the business down

A delayed process can have a direct impact on delivery. If a role is linked to a live ecommerce project, platform migration, client account, technical roadmap or growth target, every extra week without the right person adds pressure somewhere else in the business.

Existing teams may have to stretch further. Senior people may get pulled back into work they should be delegating. Projects can lose momentum, and candidates who were initially interested can start to question whether the business is ready to move.

That is especially important in a sector where hiring is often tied directly to transformation and growth. A missing frontend developer, solutions consultant, ecommerce project manager or product data specialist is rarely just an empty seat. It can affect delivery timelines, client confidence, team capacity and the ability to keep commercial plans moving.

Four interview stages is often too many

For senior, strategic or highly complex roles, there may be a good reason for a more detailed process. But for many ecommerce and digital commerce roles, four stages is starting to feel too long.

Two or three well-structured conversations should usually be enough. A strong process might include an initial conversation around experience and motivation, a second stage with key stakeholders, and a final practical or cultural discussion if needed.

What matters is that every stage has a clear purpose. If the same questions are being asked repeatedly, or extra meetings are being added because no one is ready to make a decision, the process probably needs refining.

Candidates do not expect employers to rush. But they do expect clarity, communication and momentum. When a process starts to drag, even strong opportunities can lose appeal.

AI can help, but only if it improves the process

AI is now part of recruitment on both sides. Candidates are using it to prepare CVs, tailor applications and practise interviews. Employers are using it to screen applications, support scheduling, summarise interviews and reduce administration.

Used well, AI can help hiring teams move faster. It can remove some of the manual work that slows processes down and give people more time to focus on meaningful conversations.

The risk comes when AI is used in a way that makes the process feel colder, less personal or less transparent. A Guardian report from May 2026 highlighted growing frustration among UK jobseekers around AI interviews, reporting that 30% of UK candidates surveyed had walked away from a hiring process because it included one.

For digital commerce businesses, this is an important distinction. AI should support speed, not damage trust. It should help remove friction, not remove the human judgement needed to understand whether someone can succeed in the role, work well with the team and add value to clients or internal stakeholders.

Fast hiring does not mean lowering standards

There is sometimes a concern that speeding up recruitment means compromising on quality. In reality, a slow process does not automatically lead to a better hire. It can simply introduce more friction, more doubt and more opportunities for the right candidate to accept another role.

The strongest hiring processes are both efficient and thoughtful. They are clear on what the business needs, they involve the right people at the right time and they assess skills, experience and fit without creating unnecessary duplication.

For ecommerce and digital transformation teams, that clarity is particularly important. Roles are often linked to live projects, client delivery, platform change or commercial growth. If a business knows it needs to hire, the process should be ready before candidates enter it.

5 ways to keep your hiring process fit for purpose

A better hiring process does not need to be more complicated. In most cases, it needs to be clearer, shorter and better managed from the start.

1. Agree the role before going to market
Be clear on the must-have skills, the nice-to-haves and where there is room for development. In digital commerce, it is rarely realistic to expect every candidate to match every platform, tool and project requirement perfectly.

2. Keep the interview process tight
Decide how many stages there will be, who needs to be involved and what each conversation is designed to assess. If a stage does not add anything new, it probably does not need to be there.

3. Make tasks proportionate
Practical tasks can be useful, especially for technical, delivery or consultancy roles. But they should be relevant, respectful of the candidate’s time and clearly linked to the skills needed for the role.

4. Give feedback quickly
A quick, honest update is better than silence. Even if a final decision has not been made, clear communication keeps candidates engaged and helps protect the relationship.

5. Use technology to support, not replace, human judgement
Recruitment tools and AI can help with efficiency, but they should not make the process feel impersonal. The best hiring experiences still rely on clear communication, sensible judgement and human conversation.

The businesses that move well will win

The digital commerce market remains active. Demand continues across permanent and contract hiring, particularly where businesses are investing in transformation, platform upgrades, product data, customer experience and technical delivery.

But the candidates who can make those projects happen will not wait indefinitely.

For retailers, agencies, consultancies and technology vendors, hiring speed now plays a direct role in hiring success. The businesses that move quickly, communicate clearly and keep the process human will be better placed to secure the people they need.

Recruiting faster does not mean rushing. It means being organised enough to act when the right person is in front of you.

And in a market where good digital commerce talent remains in demand, that can make all the difference.

Looking to hire digital commerce talent?

Simply Commerce works with ecommerce, retail technology and digital transformation businesses across the UK, Europe and the US, supporting permanent and contract hiring across technical, commercial and delivery roles.

If you are reviewing your hiring plans or want to sense-check your process, speak to our team.

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn

Is Delivery Ecommerce’s Most Overlooked Growth Lever? with André Sikborn Erixon, Ingrid

July 15, 2026

Is delivery still being treated too much like logistics, and not enough like customer experience?

On the latest episode of The FODcast, James sits down with André Sikborn Erixon, VP of Growth at Ingrid, to explore why delivery has become one of the most important and misunderstood parts of modern commerce.

From checkout accuracy and customer preference, through to lockers, omnichannel fulfilment and agentic commerce, this is a really interesting conversation about how delivery now shapes trust, loyalty and repeat purchase.

We discuss:

  • Why delivery experience starts long before the parcel arrives
  • How customer expectations vary depending on context
  • Why speed and price are not the only delivery variables that matter
  • The role of lockers, pickup points and sustainable delivery options
  • How shipping can become a revenue opportunity, not just a cost centre
  • Why delivery accuracy will matter even more in an AI-led commerce journey

A strong listen for anyone thinking about customer experience, fulfilment, ecommerce strategy or the future of delivery.

🎧 Listen | Comment | Share

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn

Why Product Data Is the New AI Battleground with Romain Fouache, Akeneo

June 24, 2026

Most businesses know AI is changing commerce. 

The bigger question is whether their product data is actually ready for it. 

In this episode of The FODcast, Tim speaks with Romain Fouache, CEO at Akeneo, about conversational AI, agentic commerce and why structured product information is becoming such an important topic for brands and retailers.

The conversation covers:

  • Why AI changes how products are discovered
  • The growing importance of attributes and enrichment
  •  Why “good enough” product data may no longer be enough
  • How marketplaces and ecommerce journeys could evolve from here

One line from Romain that really stuck with us: “Your product data strategy is your go-to-market strategy.”

It’s a great listen…enjoy.

🎧 Listen | Comment | Share

Written by:

Tim Roedel

CEO

Connect on LinkedIn

Shopify, Headless & The Real Cost of Ecommerce Growth – with Marina Milojkovic, Grebban

June 17, 2026

Are brands looking far enough ahead when evaluating ecommerce platforms?

On the latest episode of The FODcast, James sits down with Marina Milojkovic, VP UK at Grebban, to unpack why total cost of ownership in ecommerce is often far more complex than brands initially expect.

From app sprawl and operational complexity, through to team structure, ownership and long-term scalability, the conversation explores why platform decisions cannot just be evaluated on implementation cost alone.

We cover a whole host of topics including:

  • Why Shopify doesn’t always mean lower TCO long term
  • The hidden cost of apps, integrations and operational complexity
  • Why brands need to look at years three and four, not just implementation
  • How regular TCO audits can help keep tech stacks lean
  • Why TCO, AI, brand experience and UX are increasingly part of the same ecommerce investment conversation

A really practical discussion for brands reviewing their ecommerce setup, planning a replatform, or simply trying to understand where complexity and cost actually come from.

🎧 Listen | Comment | Share

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn

Pricing Isn’t Broken – it’s Blind, with Meghan Stabler

May 21, 2026

Pricing in retail still isn’t where it needs to be.

In this episode of The FODcast (and the launch of Season 8), we sit down with Meghan Stabler (Co-Founder and CMO at AI-driven, contextual pricing platform alentr) to explore why pricing remains one of the most complex and underdeveloped areas in digital commerce.

Drawing on her experience as former SVP of Global Marketing at BigCommerce where she helped scale the business through to IPO, Meghan shares a clear and practical perspective on the gap between performance metrics and pricing strategy – and what businesses need to rethink.

We cover:

  •  Margin vs conversion – why strong performance doesn’t always mean pricing is right
  •  The reality of discounting – easy to implement, harder to sustain
  •  AI in pricing – where it adds value and where it still falls short
  •  Static vs dynamic models – why many businesses remain reactive
  •  Pricing guardrails – protecting margin while staying competitive

If pricing is still being treated as a periodic review rather than an active, strategic lever, this is a conversation worth your time.

🎧 Listen | Comment | Share

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn

FODcast Takeaway: The Hidden Costs of eCommerce Growth

May 21, 2026

If there is one area of digital commerce that businesses consistently underestimate, it is total cost of ownership.

Platform conversations around the hidden cost of eCommerce growth often begin with licence fees, implementation costs, and delivery timelines. Those factors matter, of course, but they rarely tell the full story. What looks cost effective in year one can start to look very different by years three or four, particularly as businesses grow, operations become more complex, and additional systems begin to stack up around the core platform.

In a recent episode of The FODcast, Marina Milojkovic, VP UK at Grebban, shared some valuable insight into the realities of ecommerce total cost of ownership, and why brands need to think far more carefully about long-term operational impact rather than simply upfront platform spend.

Why ecommerce total cost of ownership is often misunderstood

One of the most interesting points Marina raised was the way businesses tend to assess ecommerce platforms in isolation. In many cases, the focus remains heavily weighted towards the visible costs. Licence fees, implementation projects, migration work, and monthly platform spend are all relatively easy to measure.

What is harder to measure are the operational costs that develop over time.

As businesses grow, ecommerce ecosystems naturally become more complicated. Additional apps are introduced, integrations expand, workflows become more fragmented, and teams often find themselves managing increasingly disconnected processes. On paper, the platform itself may still appear relatively affordable, but the wider cost of operating the ecosystem around it can rise significantly.

That is where ecommerce total cost of ownership becomes far more complex than a simple platform comparison.

Growth changes the equation

A major theme throughout the discussion was the disconnect between current business needs and future growth expectations.

A platform that works perfectly well for a growing brand today may not necessarily support the same business three years from now. As product ranges expand, international markets open up, and customer expectations increase, operational demands inevitably become more sophisticated too.

This is often where businesses begin to feel the strain. What initially felt agile and flexible can become increasingly difficult to manage as additional functionality, integrations, and workarounds are layered into the environment.

Marina’s point was not that one platform is inherently better than another. Rather, it was that businesses need to evaluate ecommerce total cost of ownership through the lens of where they are trying to get to, not simply where they are today.

The hidden operational burden behind ecommerce platforms

One of the areas that often receives less attention is the impact on internal teams.

Operational inefficiency is still a cost, even if it does not appear directly on a balance sheet. If ecommerce managers are spending hours navigating multiple disconnected tools, manually managing processes, or troubleshooting platform limitations, that time carries commercial value.

The challenge is that these inefficiencies rarely appear overnight. Teams gradually adapt to complexity, adding new tools and processes as requirements evolve, until eventually the operational burden itself becomes difficult to manage.

This feels particularly relevant in the current market. Ecommerce expectations continue to rise around customer experience, personalisation, speed, and performance, but many businesses are still trying to deliver against those expectations with relatively lean teams.

As Marina highlighted during the conversation, ecommerce total cost of ownership should include not just platform spend, but also the wider operational and organisational cost required to run it effectively.

Why regular TCO audits matter

Another practical takeaway from the discussion was the importance of reviewing ecommerce ecosystems regularly rather than treating platform decisions as fixed for the long term.

Technology stacks evolve quickly. Businesses add new tools, processes change, integrations multiply, and before long there is often significant overlap between systems and functionality. Without periodic reviews, brands can easily find themselves paying for tools they no longer use or maintaining processes that no longer make commercial sense.

Regular TCO audits allow businesses to reassess not just the technology itself, but the wider operational efficiency surrounding it. In many cases, simplification can deliver just as much value as further investment.

This is becoming increasingly important as businesses balance the pressure to innovate with the need to remain commercially disciplined.

The capability challenge behind ecommerce growth

One of the wider themes that continues to emerge across digital commerce is the growing relationship between technology investment and internal capability.

As ecommerce ecosystems become more sophisticated, businesses increasingly need people who can bridge the gap between systems, operations, customer experience, and commercial performance. That is not always an easy skillset to find.

Implementing technology is one part of the challenge. Managing complexity over time is another entirely.

We know first hand that the businesses seeing the strongest outcomes are often those that combine platform investment with the right operational structures and commercial talent around it. As technology stacks become more interconnected, the ability to manage change, interpret data, and continuously optimise the customer experience becomes increasingly valuable.

In many ways, ecommerce total cost of ownership is now as much about organisational capability as it is about technology itself.

Final thoughts

What came through clearly in this conversation is that ecommerce total cost of ownership extends far beyond the initial platform decision. Upfront costs are only one part of a much broader operational picture.

As Marina highlighted, businesses need to think more carefully about scalability, operational efficiency, resource demands, and long-term growth when evaluating ecommerce platforms and wider digital commerce investments.

From our perspective, it also reinforces something we continue to see across the market: technology alone rarely solves complexity. The businesses that scale most effectively are usually those that combine the right platforms with the right operational thinking and the right people around them.

A big thank you to Marina for sharing her insight and experience on this topic. If ecommerce platform strategy or total cost of ownership is something you are currently exploring, the full episode is well worth a listen.

Catch up with the episode here

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn

FODcast Takeaway: Retail Pricing Strategy in 2026 (And Why It’s Still the Hardest Problem to Solve)

May 1, 2026

If there is one part of digital commerce that still refuses to fall neatly into place, it is pricing. For all the progress made across platforms, personalisation, and customer experience, pricing often remains slightly out of step, more reactive than strategic, and more constrained than it probably should be. As we move further into 2026, that gap is becoming harder to ignore.

In a recent episode of The FODcast, Meghan Stabler, Co-founder of alentr and former SVP of Global Marketing at BigCommerce, shared a perspective that will feel familiar to many retailers. Pricing is not broken, but it is lagging behind the rest of the ecosystem, and that is starting to have a real commercial impact.

Why pricing still lags behind

When you look across the digital commerce landscape, most areas have evolved quickly. Front-end experiences are more refined, personalisation is more accessible, and there is certainly no shortage of data. And yet, pricing is still often managed in ways that feel surprisingly manual. It is reviewed periodically rather than actively optimised, and in many cases it is shaped as much by internal limitations as it is by market conditions. That creates a disconnect. Particularly in a market where margins are under pressure and customers are more informed than ever, the ability to respond with precision, rather than broad adjustments, becomes incredibly important.

The reality retailers are navigating in 2026

The underlying challenges have not changed dramatically, but they have become more pronounced. There is a constant tension between staying competitive and protecting margin, and discounting remains an easy, if not always sustainable, lever to pull. At the same time, metrics like conversion rate do not always tell the full story.

A strong conversion rate can just as easily suggest that pricing is too low as it can that it is right. Layer on top of that the continued unpredictability in supply chains and cost bases, and it becomes clear why static pricing models are starting to feel increasingly fragile.

AI in retail pricing: promise and practicality

Unsurprisingly, much of the conversation has shifted towards AI in retail pricing, and with good reason. The potential is there to analyse vast amounts of data, respond to competitor movements, and adjust pricing in a way that simply has not been possible before. But in practice, things are a little more nuanced.

The challenge for many retailers is not access to AI tools, but the ability to embed them effectively into decision making. That requires clean data, clear ownership, and a commercial framework that defines how pricing should behave in different scenarios. AI can absolutely enhance pricing strategy, but it works best when it is supporting a well defined approach, not trying to replace one.

Towards a more considered pricing model

What is emerging is not a need for constant change, but for more controlled flexibility. The retailers making progress here tend to have a clear baseline built around their cost structure and margin expectations, combined with defined guardrails that prevent unnecessary erosion. From there, pricing can be adjusted more selectively, based on where it will genuinely make a difference. It is a subtle shift, but an important one. Moving away from reactive discounting towards more deliberate, informed decisions changes the role pricing plays within the business.

Why this matters now

For a long time, pricing has sat slightly outside of digital transformation conversations, often seen as something separate from the technology stack. That is changing. As platforms become more standardised and experience becomes more consistent across the market, pricing is one of the few remaining levers that can materially influence commercial performance. It is also one of the least mature areas in many organisations, which makes it both a challenge and an opportunity.

The talent behind the shift

One of the more interesting themes that continues to come through is the role of people in all of this. Technology is advancing quickly, but the capability to interpret data, apply commercial judgement, and bridge the gap between systems and outcomes is still in relatively short supply. Pricing, in particular, sits across multiple disciplines, data, finance, and trading, and that makes it harder to define, and often harder to hire for.

As AI becomes more embedded, that gap does not disappear. If anything, it becomes more important to have the right people shaping how those tools are used.

Final thought

What came through clearly in this conversation is that pricing is not a new problem, but it is becoming a more visible and more complex one. As Megan highlighted, the combination of margin pressure, customer expectation, and the growing role of AI is forcing retailers to rethink how they approach it.

From our side, what we continue to see across the market is that this is not just a technology challenge. It is a capability one. The retailers making the most progress are those who are able to bring together data, commercial thinking, and the right people to make sense of it.

Those who start to treat pricing as a strategic capability, supported by both technology and talent, are far more likely to protect margin and drive sustainable growth. Those who do not risk staying in a cycle of reactive decision making in a market that increasingly rewards precision.

A big thank you to Megan for sharing her time and insight on this topic. If this is an area you are currently exploring, it is well worth listening to the full episode for a deeper dive into the thinking behind it.

Catch up with the episode here

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn

B2B Commerce Isn’t Broken – It’s Complicated with Tom Williams, UNRVLD

May 1, 2026

B2B commerce complexity isn’t just technical. It’s organisational, behavioural and cultural.

On this week’s episode of The FODcast, James sits down with Tom Williams, Managing Partner at UNRVLD to unpack why B2B transformations stall…and what actually gets them moving.

We cover a whole host of topics including:

  • Complex pricing + org structures: different users, permissions and hierarchies; and why it needs uncovering early
  • Legacy order channels (email, punchout, OCR and more): you often can’t “switch it off” even if it’s inefficient
  • Customer-first vs tech-first: most businesses start with a feature tick list, not customer behaviour
  • Digital maturity reality checks: why teams think they’re further along than they are
  • Integration first: a robust middleware approach that lets you change systems without breaking everything else

If you’re modernising B2B, this is a practical conversation: start with the “as is”, map the “to be”, then make progress iteratively – without forcing a big bang.

🎧 Listen | Comment | Share

Written by:

James Hodges

Director of Client Engagement

Connect on LinkedIn